Decision Making in Concurrent Multitasking: Do People Adapt to Task Interference?
Menno Nijboer,
Niels A Taatgen,
Annelies Brands,
Jelmer P Borst and
Hedderik van Rijn
PLOS ONE, 2013, vol. 8, issue 11, 1-12
Abstract:
While multitasking has received a great deal of attention from researchers, we still know little about how well people adapt their behavior to multitasking demands. In three experiments, participants were presented with a multicolumn subtraction task, which required working memory in half of the trials. This primary task had to be combined with a secondary task requiring either working memory or visual attention, resulting in different types of interference. Before each trial, participants were asked to choose which secondary task they wanted to perform concurrently with the primary task. We predicted that if people seek to maximize performance or minimize effort required to perform the dual task, they choose task combinations that minimize interference. While performance data showed that the predicted optimal task combinations indeed resulted in minimal interference between tasks, the preferential choice data showed that a third of participants did not show any adaptation, and for the remainder it took a considerable number of trials before the optimal task combinations were chosen consistently. On the basis of these results we argue that, while in principle people are able to adapt their behavior according to multitasking demands, selection of the most efficient combination of strategies is not an automatic process.
Date: 2013
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0079583 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id= ... 79583&type=printable (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0079583
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079583
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in PLOS ONE from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosone ().