Elicitation of Expert Prior Opinion: Application to the MYPAN Trial in Childhood Polyarteritis Nodosa

Lisa V Hampson, John Whitehead, Despina Eleftheriou, Catrin Tudur-Smith, Rachel Jones, David Jayne, Helen Hickey, Michael W Beresford, Claudia Bracaglia, Afonso Caldas, Rolando Cimaz, Joke Dehoorne, Pavla Dolezalova, Mark Friswell, Marija Jelusic, Stephen D Marks, Neil Martin, Anne-Marie McMahon, Joachim Peitz, Annet van Royen-Kerkhof, Oguz Soylemezoglu and Paul A Brogan

PLOS ONE, 2015, vol. 10, issue 3, 1-14

Abstract: Objectives: Definitive sample sizes for clinical trials in rare diseases are usually infeasible. Bayesian methodology can be used to maximise what is learnt from clinical trials in these circumstances. We elicited expert prior opinion for a future Bayesian randomised controlled trial for a rare inflammatory paediatric disease, polyarteritis nodosa (MYPAN, Mycophenolate mofetil for polyarteritis nodosa). Methods: A Bayesian prior elicitation meeting was convened. Opinion was sought on the probability that a patient in the MYPAN trial treated with cyclophosphamide would achieve disease remission within 6-months, and on the relative efficacies of mycophenolate mofetil and cyclophosphamide. Expert opinion was combined with previously unseen data from a recently completed randomised controlled trial in ANCA associated vasculitis. Results: A pan-European group of fifteen experts participated in the elicitation meeting. Consensus expert prior opinion was that the most likely rates of disease remission within 6 months on cyclophosphamide or mycophenolate mofetil were 74% and 71%, respectively. This prior opinion will now be taken forward and will be modified to formulate a Bayesian posterior opinion once the MYPAN trial data from 40 patients randomised 1:1 to either CYC or MMF become available. Conclusions: We suggest that the methodological template we propose could be applied to trial design for other rare diseases.

Date: 2015
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0120981 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id= ... 20981&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0120981

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120981

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS ONE from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosone (plosone@plos.org).