The psychometric properties of the ‘safety attitudes questionnaire’ in out-of-hours primary care services in the Netherlands
Marleen Smits,
Ellen Keizer,
Paul Giesen,
Ellen Catharina Tveter Deilkås,
Dag Hofoss and
Gunnar Tschudi Bondevik
PLOS ONE, 2017, vol. 12, issue 2, 1-12
Abstract:
Background: The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ) is one of the most widely used instruments to assess safety culture among healthcare providers. The ambulatory version of the SAQ (SAQ-AV) can be used in the primary care setting. Our study objective was to examine the underlying factors and psychometric properties of the Dutch translation of the SAQ-AV in out-of-hours primary care services. Design: Cross-sectional observational study using a web-survey. Setting: Sixteen out-of-hours general practitioner cooperatives and two call centers in the Netherlands. Participants: Primary healthcare providers in out-of-hours services. Main outcome measures: Item-descriptive statistics, factor loadings, Cronbach’s alpha scores, corrected item-total correlations, scale correlations. Results: The questionnaire was answered by 853 (43.2%) healthcare professionals. In the factor analyses, 784 respondents were included; mainly general practitioners (N = 470) and triage nurses (N = 189). Items were included in the analyses based on question type and results from previous studies. Five factors were drawn with reliability scores between .49 and .86 and a good construct validity. The five factors covered 27 of the 62 questionnaire items, with three to five items per factor. Conclusions: The Dutch translation of the SAQ-AV, with five factors, seems to be a reliable tool for measuring patient safety culture and guide quality improvement interventions in out-of-hours primary care services. The Dutch factor structure differed from the original SAQ-AV and other translated versions. In future studies, the questionnaire should be validated further by examining if there is a relationship between the responses on the SAQ-AV, patient experiences, and the occurrence of adverse events.
Date: 2017
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0172390 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id= ... 72390&type=printable (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0172390
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172390
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in PLOS ONE from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosone ().