Implementing the PHMRC shortened questionnaire: Survey duration of open and closed questions in three sites

Abraham D Flaxman, Andrea Stewart, Jonathan C Joseph, Nurul Alam, Saidul Alam, Hafizur Chowdhury, Saman Gamage, Hebe Gouda, Rohina Joshi, Marilla Lucero, Meghan D Mooney, Devarsetty Praveen, Rasika Rampatige, Hazel Remolador, Diozele Sanvictores, Peter T Serina, Peter Kim Streatfield, Veronica Tallo, Nandalal Wijesekera, Christopher J L Murray, Bernardo Hernandez, Alan D Lopez and Ian Douglas Riley

PLOS ONE, 2017, vol. 12, issue 6, 1-12

Abstract: Background: More countries are using verbal autopsy as a part of routine mortality surveillance. The length of time required to complete a verbal autopsy interview is a key logistical consideration for planning large-scale surveillance. Methods: We use the PHMRC shortened questionnaire to conduct verbal autopsy interviews at three sites and collect data on the length of time required to complete the interview. This instrument uses a novel checklist of keywords to capture relevant information from the open response. The open response section is timed separately from the section consisting of closed questions. Results: We found the median time to complete the entire interview was approximately 25 minutes and did not vary substantially by age-specific module. The median time for the open response section was approximately 4 minutes and 60% of interviewees mentioned at least one keyword within the open response section. Conclusions: The length of time required to complete the interview was short enough for large-scale routine use. The open-response section did not add a substantial amount of time and provided useful information which can be used to increase the accuracy of the predictions of the cause of death. The novel checklist approach further reduces the burden of transcribing and translating a large amount of free text. This makes the PHMRC instrument ideal for national mortality surveillance.

Date: 2017
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0178085 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id= ... 78085&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0178085

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178085

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS ONE from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosone ().