Lung cancer and socioeconomic status in a pooled analysis of case-control studies
Jan Hovanec,
Jack Siemiatycki,
David I Conway,
Ann Olsson,
Isabelle Stücker,
Florence Guida,
Karl-Heinz Jöckel,
Hermann Pohlabeln,
Wolfgang Ahrens,
Irene Brüske,
Heinz-Erich Wichmann,
Per Gustavsson,
Dario Consonni,
Franco Merletti,
Lorenzo Richiardi,
Lorenzo Simonato,
Cristina Fortes,
Marie-Elise Parent,
John McLaughlin,
Paul Demers,
Maria Teresa Landi,
Neil Caporaso,
Adonina Tardón,
David Zaridze,
Neonila Szeszenia-Dabrowska,
Peter Rudnai,
Jolanta Lissowska,
Eleonora Fabianova,
John Field,
Rodica Stanescu Dumitru,
Vladimir Bencko,
Lenka Foretova,
Vladimir Janout,
Hans Kromhout,
Roel Vermeulen,
Paolo Boffetta,
Kurt Straif,
Joachim Schüz,
Benjamin Kendzia,
Beate Pesch,
Thomas Brüning and
Thomas Behrens
PLOS ONE, 2018, vol. 13, issue 2, 1-18
Abstract:
Background: An association between low socioeconomic status (SES) and lung cancer has been observed in several studies, but often without adequate control for smoking behavior. We studied the association between lung cancer and occupationally derived SES, using data from the international pooled SYNERGY study. Methods: Twelve case-control studies from Europe and Canada were included in the analysis. Based on occupational histories of study participants we measured SES using the International Socio-Economic Index of Occupational Status (ISEI) and the European Socio-economic Classification (ESeC). We divided the ISEI range into categories, using various criteria. Stratifying by gender, we calculated odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) by unconditional logistic regression, adjusting for age, study, and smoking behavior. We conducted analyses by histological subtypes of lung cancer and subgroup analyses by study region, birth cohort, education and occupational exposure to known lung carcinogens. Results: The analysis dataset included 17,021 cases and 20,885 controls. There was a strong elevated OR between lung cancer and low SES, which was attenuated substantially after adjustment for smoking, however a social gradient persisted. SES differences in lung cancer risk were higher among men (lowest vs. highest SES category: ISEI OR 1.84 (95% CI 1.61–2.09); ESeC OR 1.53 (95% CI 1.44–1.63)), than among women (lowest vs. highest SES category: ISEI OR 1.54 (95% CI 1.20–1.98); ESeC OR 1.34 (95% CI 1.19–1.52)). Conclusion: SES remained a risk factor for lung cancer after adjustment for smoking behavior.
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0192999 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id= ... 92999&type=printable (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0192999
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192999
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in PLOS ONE from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosone ().