Health-related quality of life in patients with venous leg ulcer treated in primary care in Brazil and Portugal
Sandra Maria da Solidade Simões de Oliveira Torres,
Rhayssa de Oliveira e Araújo,
Isabelle Katherinne Fernandes Costa,
Manuela Pinto Tibúrcio,
Amanda Jessica Gomes de Sousa,
Aline Maino Pergola-Marconato,
Thalyta Cristina Mansano-Schlosser,
Marina de Góes Salvetti,
Felismina Rosa Parreira Mendes,
Gilson de Vasconcelos Torres and
Eulalia Maria Chaves Maia
PLOS ONE, 2018, vol. 13, issue 4, 1-10
Abstract:
Background: Venous ulcers constitute an important public health problem as they can cause disability with consequences for multiple dimensions of quality of life. Objective: To describe the quality of life in patients with venous leg ulcer treated in primary care in two cities from Brazil and Portugal. Methods: This was a cross-sectional comparative study with a non-probabilistic sample of 171 patients with venous leg ulcers who were treated in primary care in two cities from Brazil and Portugal, namely, Natal and Évora. A form covering sociodemographic and health data and the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey were used, and descriptive and inferential analyses were performed. Results: Significant differences in age and income were observed between the two samples. Patients with venous leg ulcer from Brazil had lower income and were younger than those from Portugal. Quality of life scores were significantly higher in Portugal for the physical aspects, pain, and social functioning, among domains, and for the physical health dimension and total score of QOL. Conclusion: The quality of life was better in Portugal than in Brazil and the differences between the countries need further investigation.
Date: 2018
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0195990 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id= ... 95990&type=printable (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0195990
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195990
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in PLOS ONE from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosone ().