EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Participant preferences for an Aboriginal-specific fall prevention program: Measuring the value of culturally-appropriate care

Blake Angell, Tracey Laba, Caroline Lukaszyk, Julieann Coombes, Sandra Eades, Lisa Keay, Rebecca Ivers and Stephen Jan

PLOS ONE, 2018, vol. 13, issue 8, 1-9

Abstract: Background: Culturally-specific services are central to efforts to improve the health of Aboriginal Australians. Few empirical studies have demonstrated the value of such services relative to mainstream alternatives. Objective: To assess the preferences and willingness to pay (WTP) of participants for attending a class and the relative importance of transport, cost and cultural-appropriateness in the choices made by participants. Design: A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted alongside a study of a culturally-specific fall-prevention service. Attributes that were assessed were out-of-pocket costs, whether transport was provided and whether the class was Aboriginal-specific. Choices of participants were modelled using panel-mixed logit methods. Results: 60 patients completed the DCE. Attending a service was strongly preferred over no service (selected 99% of the time). Assuming equivalent efficacy of fall-prevention programs, participants indicated a preference for services that were culturally-specific (OR 1.25 95% CI: 1.00–1.55) and incurred lower out-of-pocket participant costs (OR 1.19 95% CI 1.11–1.27). The provision of transport did not have a statistically significant influence on service choice (p = 0.57). Discussion and conclusions: This represents the first published DCE in the health field examining preferences amongst an Aboriginal population. The results empirically demonstrate the value of the culturally-specific element of a program has to this cohort and the potential that stated-preference methods can have in incorporating the preferences of Aboriginal Australians and valuing cultural components of health services. Note on terminology: As the majority of the NSW Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population is Aboriginal (97.2%), this population will be referred to as ‘Aboriginal’ in this manuscript.

Date: 2018
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0203264 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id= ... 03264&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0203264

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203264

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS ONE from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosone ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-29
Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0203264