EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Rotating hinge knee versus constrained condylar knee in revision total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis

Jung-Ro Yoon, Ji-Young Cheong, Jung-Taek Im, Phil-Sun Park, Jae-Ok Park and Young-Soo Shin

PLOS ONE, 2019, vol. 14, issue 3, 1-14

Abstract: There is debate in the literature whether rotating hinge knee (RHK) or constrained condylar knee (CCK) prostheses lead to better clinical outcomes and survival rates in patients undergoing revision total knee arthroplasty (RTKA). The purpose of this meta-analysis is to compare the survivorship and clinical outcomes of RHK and CCK prostheses. In this meta-analysis, we reviewed studies that evaluated pain and function scores, range of motion (ROM), complications, and survival rates in patients treated with RHK or CCK with short-term (

Date: 2019
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0214279 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id= ... 14279&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0214279

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214279

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS ONE from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosone ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0214279