Cross-cultural adaptation of the 4-Habits Coding Scheme into French to assess physician communication skills

Alexandre Bellier, Philippe Chaffanjon, Edward Krupat, Patrice Francois and José Labarère

PLOS ONE, 2020, vol. 15, issue 4, 1-16

Abstract: Background: The Four Habits Coding Scheme (4-HCS) is a standardized instrument designed to assess physicians’ communication skills from an external rater’s perspective, based on video-recorded consultations. Objective: To perform the cross-cultural adaptation of the 4-HCS into French and to assess its psychometric properties. Methods: The 4-HCS was cross-culturally adapted by conducting forward and backward translations with independent translators, following international guidelines. Four raters rated 200 video-recorded medical student consultations with standardized patients, using the French version of the 4-HCS. We examined the internal consistency, factor structure, construct validity, and reliability of the 4-HCS. Results: The mean overall 4-HCS score was 76.44 (standard deviation, 12.34), with no floor or ceiling effects across subscales. The median rating duration of rating was 8 min (range, 4–19). Cronbach’s alpha was 0.94 for the overall 4-HCS, ranging from 0.72 to 0.88 across subscales. In confirmatory factor analysis, goodness-of-fit statistics did not corroborate the hypothesized 4-habit structure. Exploratory factor analysis resulted in two dimensions, with the merging of three conceptually related habits into a single dimension and substantial cross-loading for 15 out of 23 items. Median average absolute-agreement intra-class correlation coefficient estimates were 0.74 (range, 0.68–0.84) and 0.85 (range, 0.76–0.91) for inter- and intra-rater reliability of habit subscales, respectively. Conclusion: The French version of the 4-HCS demonstrates satisfactory internal consistency but requires the use of two independent raters to achieve acceptable reliability. The underlying factor structure of the original US version and cross-cultural adaptations of the 4-HCS deserve further investigation.

Date: 2020
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0230672 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id= ... 30672&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0230672

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230672

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS ONE from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosone (plosone@plos.org).