Improved measurement of tinnitus severity: Study of the dimensionality and reliability of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory

Elżbieta Gos, Adam Sagan, Piotr H Skarzynski and Henryk Skarzynski

PLOS ONE, 2020, vol. 15, issue 8, 1-22

Abstract: Objective: The Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) is widely used in clinical practice and research as a three-dimensional measure of tinnitus severity. Despite extensive use, its factor structure remains unclear. Furthermore, THI can be considered a reliable measure only if Cronbach’s alpha coefficient and Classical Test Theory is used. The more modern and robust Item Response Theory (IRT) has so far not been used to psychometrically evaluate THI. In theory, IRT allows a more precise evaluation of THI’s factor structure, reliability, and the quality of individual items. Method: There were 1115 patients with tinnitus (556 women and 559 men), aged 19–84 years (M = 51.55; SD = 13.28). Results: The bifactor model had the best fit (RMSEA = 0.055; CFI = 0.976; SRMR = 0.040) and revealed one strong general factor and several weak specific factors. Mokken scaling generated a reliable unidimensional scale (Loevinger’s H = 0.463). In order to refine THI we propose that five items be removed. The IRT Generalized Partial Credit Model generated good parameters in terms of item location (difficulty), discrimination, and information content of items. Conclusion: Our findings support the use of THI to evaluate tinnitus severity in terms of it being a reliable unidimensional scale. However, clinicians and researchers should rely only on its overall score, which reflects global tinnitus severity. To improve its psychometric quality, several refinements of THI are proposed.

Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0237778 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id= ... 37778&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0237778

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237778

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS ONE from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosone (plosone@plos.org).