Morphologic analysis of macular neovascularizations by OCT angiography—Technical limitations in the comparison of 3×3mm and 6×6mm images
Henrik Faatz,
Kai Rothaus,
Marie-Louise Gunnemann,
Marius Book,
Pia Wilming,
Matthias Gutfleisch,
Georg Spital,
Albrecht Lommatzsch and
Daniel Pauleikhoff
PLOS ONE, 2020, vol. 15, issue 8, 1-11
Abstract:
Background: The aim of this study was to ascertain whether there are relevant differences between the vascular morphology of macular neovascularizations (MNV) in 3×3mm and 6×6mm images, produced by optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA). Methods: MNV of 49 patients were automated quantitative analysed, measuring area, flow, the fractal dimension, average vessel length, vascular density, and average vessel caliber. These parameters were compared between the 3×3mm and the 6×6mm images. Results: A strong linear association was found between the 3×3mm and the 6×6mm images. While area, flow, and FD of the MNV were very similar, the 3×3mm images showed significantly lower average total vessel length, greater vascular density, and lower average vessel caliber. Conclusion: In quantitative analysis of the morphologic parameters of MNV in 3×3mm and 6×6mm images, the structures are not directly equivalent in the two sizes of scan. The images must be evaluated on an individual basis.
Date: 2020
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0237785 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id= ... 37785&type=printable (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0237785
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237785
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in PLOS ONE from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosone ().