Characterizing gait pattern dynamics during symmetric and asymmetric walking using autoregressive modeling

Helia Mahzoun Alzakerin, Yannis Halkiadakis and Kristin D Morgan

PLOS ONE, 2020, vol. 15, issue 12, 1-11

Abstract: Gait asymmetry is often observed in populations with varying degrees of neuromuscular control. While changes in vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) peak magnitude are associated with altered limb loading that can be observed during asymmetric gait, the challenge is identifying techniques with the sensitivity to detect these altered movement patterns. Autoregressive (AR) modeling has successfully delineated between healthy and pathological gait during running; but has been little explored in walking. Thus, AR modeling was implemented to assess differences in vGRF pattern dynamics during symmetric and asymmetric walking. We hypothesized that the AR model coefficients would better detect differences amongst the symmetric and asymmetric walking conditions than the vGRF peak magnitude mean. Seventeen healthy individuals performed a protocol that involved walking on a split-belt instrumented treadmill at different symmetric (0.75m/s, 1.0 m/s, 1.5 m/s) and asymmetric (Side 1: 0.75m/s-Side 2:1.0 m/s; Side 1:1.0m/s-Side 2:1.5 m/s) gait conditions. Vertical ground reaction force peaks extracted during the weight-acceptance and propulsive phase of each step were used to construct a vGRF peak time series. Then, a second order AR model was fit to the vGRF peak waveform data to determine the AR model coefficients. The resulting AR coefficients were plotted on a stationarity triangle and their distance from the triangle centroid was computed. Significant differences in vGRF patterns were detected amongst the symmetric and asymmetric conditions using the AR modeling coefficients (p = 0.01); however, no differences were found when comparing vGRF peak magnitude means. These findings suggest that AR modeling has the sensitivity to identify differences in gait asymmetry that could aid in monitoring rehabilitation progression.

Date: 2020
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0243221 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id= ... 43221&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0243221

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243221

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS ONE from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosone ().