Advantages of score-based delirium detection compared to a clinical delirium assessment—a retrospective, monocentric cohort study
Markus Jäckel,
Nico Aicher,
Xavier Bemtgen,
Jonathan Rilinger,
Viviane Zotzmann,
Paul Marc Biever,
Alexander Supady,
Peter Stachon,
Daniel Duerschmied,
Tobias Wengenmayer,
Christoph Bode and
Dawid Leander Staudacher
PLOS ONE, 2021, vol. 16, issue 11, 1-13
Abstract:
Purpose: Delirium is an underdiagnosed complication on intensive care units (ICU). We hypothesized that a score-based delirium detection using the Nudesc score identifies more patients compared to a traditional diagnosis of delirium by ICU physicians. Methods: In this retrospective study, all patients treated on a general medical ICU with 30 beds in a university hospital in 2019 were analyzed. Primary outcome was a documented physician diagnosis of delirium, or a delirium score ≥2 using the Nudesc. Results: In 205/943 included patients (21.7%), delirium was diagnosed by ICU physicians compared to 438/943 (46.4%; ratio 2.1) by Nudesc≥2. Both assessments were independent predictors of ICU stay (p
Date: 2021
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0259841 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id= ... 59841&type=printable (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0259841
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259841
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in PLOS ONE from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosone ().