Is a single dose of commonly used antibiotics effective in preventing maternal infection after cesarean section? A network meta-analysis

Ye Huang, Xinbo Yin, Xiaokai Wang, Fangyi Zhou, Xiaoxia Cao, Yeqiong Han and Shichang Sun

PLOS ONE, 2022, vol. 17, issue 4, 1-14

Abstract: Objective: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of different antibiotic classes and dosages in preventing maternal infection after cesarean delivery. Methods: Databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between January 1980 and January 2021 on antibiotic use for the prevention of maternal infection after cesarean delivery. The outcomes were endometritis, febrile morbidity, and wound infection, reported as odds ratios (OR) and surface under the cumulative ranking curve analysis scores. Results: A total of 31 RCTs met the inclusion criteria. In the network meta-analysis (NMA) for endometritis, pooled network OR values indicated that the following interventions were superior to placebo: cephalosporins (OR: 0.18, 95% credibility interval [CrI]: 0.07–0.45), penicillins (OR: 0.19, 95% CrI: 0.07–0.50), penicillins (multiple doses) (OR: 0.20, 95% CrI: 0.05–0.65), combination therapies (OR: 0.22, 95% CrI: 0.09–0.54), and cephalosporins (multiple doses) (OR: 0.25, 95% CrI: 0.08–0.74). In the NMA for febrile morbidity, placebo was more effective than the other interventions. In the NMA for wound infection, pooled network OR values indicated that the following interventions were superior to placebo: penicillin (OR: 0.14, 95% CrI: 0.05–0.37), cephalosporins (OR: 0.19, 95% CrI: 0.08–0.41), cephalosporins (multiple doses) (OR: 0.20, 95% CrI: 0.06–0.58), combination therapies (OR: 0.29, 95% CrI: 0.13–0.57), macrolides (OR: 0.33, 95% CrI: 0.15–0.74), and penicillins (multiple doses) (OR: 0.40, 95% CrI: 0.17–0.91). Conclusions: Compared with placebo, a single dose of commonly used antibiotics may prevent maternal infection after cesarean delivery. However, the incidence of febrile morbidity was not reduced.

Date: 2022
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0264438 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id= ... 64438&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0264438

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264438

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS ONE from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosone ().