Skeletal muscle analysis of panoramic ultrasound is reliable across multiple raters

Christopher J Cleary, Omid Nabavizadeh, Kaycie L Young and Ashley A Herda

PLOS ONE, 2022, vol. 17, issue 5, 1-12

Abstract: Ultrasound devices are common in muscle physiology laboratories due to their ease of use and validity to assess skeletal muscle characteristics. The current study assessed the reliability of ultrasound skeletal muscle image analysis across multiple raters with limited experience. Vastus lateralis (VL), rectus femoris (RF), and first dorsal interosseus (FDI) images were separately analyzed by three novice raters to determine muscle thickness (MT), cross-sectional area (CSA), and echo-intensity (EI). Separate analyses of variance (ANOVA) assessed statistical differences between and within raters. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) between (inter-rater) and within (intra-rater) raters, the standard error of the measurement (SEM) and minimal difference needed to be considered real were calculated. Inter-rater reliability was high for the VL and RF (ICC: 0.984–0.999), while the FDI was lower (0.614–0.962). Further, intra-rater reliability was greater than 0.961 for each rater. SEM values calculated for inter-rater reliability expressed as a percentage of the mean ranged from 0.4–5.8% across variables. Similarly, SEM values for intra-rater reliability were between 0.8–5.8%, 0.6–3.6%, and 0.4–3.2% for Raters 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Despite this, significant differences (p

Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0267641 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id= ... 67641&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0267641

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267641

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS ONE from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosone ().