EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Surface defect detection method for electronic panels based on attention mechanism and dual detection heads

Le Wang, Xixia Huang and Zhangjing Zheng

PLOS ONE, 2023, vol. 18, issue 1, 1-21

Abstract: Automatic detection of surface defects in electronic panels is receiving increasing attention in the quality control of products. The surface defect detection of electronic panels is different from other target detection scenarios and is a meaningful and challenging problem. Its main manifestation is that surface defects of electronic panels usually exhibit extreme irregularity and small target characteristics, which bring great difficulties to the task of surface defect target detection including feature extraction and so on. The traditional methods can only detect a very small number of defect classes under specific detection conditions. And due to the weak robustness of these methods, they cannot be applied in real production scenarios on a large scale. Based on this, this paper applies the target detection technique under deep learning to the surface defect detection scenario of electronic panels for the first time. At the same time, in order to make the designed target detection network applicable to the electronic panel surface defect detection scenario and to enhance the interpretability of the designed target detection network in terms of computer mechanism. We design a deformable convolution module with a convolutional self-attentive module to learn the offset and a dual detection head incorporating the SE (Squeeze-and-Excitation) mechanism for the irregular characteristics of electronic panel surface defects and the small target characteristics, respectively. Finally, we carried out a series of experiments on our own electronic panel defect data set, including comparison with the most advanced target detection algorithms and a series of ablation experiments against our proposed method. The final experimental results prove that our method not only has better interpretability, but also has better metric performance, in which the map_0.5 metric reaches 78.257%, which is an increase of 13.506 percentage points over YOLOV5 and 33.457 percentage points higher than Retinanet. The results prove the proposed method is effective.

Date: 2023
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0280363 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id= ... 80363&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0280363

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280363

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS ONE from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosone ().

 
Page updated 2025-06-07
Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0280363