Infertile men with semen parameters above WHO reference limits at first assessment may deserve a second semen analysis: Challenging the guidelines in the real-life scenario
Luca Boeri,
Edoardo Pozzi,
Paolo Capogrosso,
Giuseppe Fallara,
Federico Belladelli,
Luigi Candela,
Nicolò Schifano,
Christian Corsini,
Walter Cazzaniga,
Daniele Cignoli,
Eugenio Ventimiglia,
Marina Pontillo,
Massimo Alfano,
Francesco Montorsi and
Andrea Salonia
PLOS ONE, 2023, vol. 18, issue 1, 1-12
Abstract:
Objectives: To investigate which infertile men with semen parameters above WHO reference limits at first semen analysis deserve a second semen test. Materials and methods: Data from 1358 consecutive infertile men were analysed. Patients underwent two consecutive semen analyses at the same laboratory. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression models tested the association between clinical variables and semen parameters. A new predicting model was identified through logistic regression analysis exploring potential predictors of semen parameters below WHO reference limits after a previously normal one. Diagnostic accuracy of the new model was compared with AUA/ASRM and EAU guidelines. Decision curve analyses (DCA) tested their clinical benefit. Results: Of 1358, 212 (15.6%) infertile men had semen parameters above WHO reference limits at first analysis. Of 212, 87 (41.0%) had a second semen analysis with results above WHO reference limits. Men with sperm parameters below reference limits at second analysis had higher FSH values, but lower testicular volume (TV) (all p
Date: 2023
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0280519 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id= ... 80519&type=printable (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0280519
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280519
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in PLOS ONE from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosone ().