The experience of being a caregiver of patients with digestive cancer, from patients and caregivers’ perception: A mixed study

Charlotte Grivel, Pierre Nizet, Manon Martin, Solange Pécout, Aurélie Lepeintre, Yann Touchefeu, Sonia Prot-Labarthe, Adrien Evin and Jean-François Huon

PLOS ONE, 2023, vol. 18, issue 7, 1-20

Abstract: Backgrounds: Caregivers are essential in the care of a patient with digestive cancer. Considering their experience and needs is crucial. Objectives: To explore the experience of caregivers of patients with digestive cancer and to compare the perspectives of patients and caregivers. Methods: A mixed-methods study with a cross-sectional prospective and a comprehensive qualitative dimension was performed in a medical oncology unit in a French tertiary hospital. Dyads made of patients with digestive cancer and their caregiver were recruited. The Caregiver Reaction Assessment (CRA) and the Supportive Care Needs Survey for Partners and Caregivers (SCNS-PC) questionnaires were distributed to caregivers. The CRA was used to measure the caregiver burden and the SCNS-PC was used to identify the unmet supportive care needs of caregivers. Semi-structured interviews with the dyads were conducted. Qualitative interviews addressed various dimensions of the caregiver’s experience from each dyad’s member perspective. Results: Thirty-two caregivers completed the questionnaires. Responses showed high self-esteem, schedule burden, and a need for care and information services. Ten dyads participated in the interviews. Three themes emerged from the caregiver’s interviews: illness is an upheaval; loneliness and helplessness are experienced; caring is a natural role with positive outcomes. Four themes emerged from patient’s interviews: the caregiver naturally assumes the role and gets closer; he is the patient’s anchor; his life is disrupted; anxiety and guilt accompany the desire to protect him. In comparing patient and caregiver data, the main theme of disagreement was their relationship. Conclusions: Caregiver care does not appear to be optimal, particularly in terms of their need for information. Patients have a fairly good representation of their experience, but the caregivers’ opinion need to be considered.

Date: 2023
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0287335 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id= ... 87335&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0287335

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287335

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS ONE from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosone ().