Clinical performance study of a fecal bacterial signature test for colorectal cancer screening
Marta Malagón,
Elizabeth Alwers,
Lia Oliver,
Sara Ramió-Pujol,
Mireia Sánchez-Vizcaino,
Joan Amoedo,
Salomé de Cambra,
Mariona Serra-Pagès,
Antoni Castells,
Xavier Aldeguer,
Jesús Garcia-Gil and
Hermann Brenner
PLOS ONE, 2023, vol. 18, issue 11, 1-12
Abstract:
The fecal immunochemical test (FIT) is the most widely used test for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. RAID-CRC Screen is a new non-invasive test based on fecal bacterial markers, developed to complement FIT by increasing its specificity. The test was previously clinically evaluated in FIT-positive patients (>20 μg of hemoglobin/g of feces, “FIT20”), in which it reduced the proportion of false positive results by 16.3% while maintaining most of FIT20’s sensitivity. The aim of this study was to compare the sensitivity and specificity of a CRC screening program using RAID-CRC Screen in addition to FIT20 as a triage test in a European screening population undergoing screening colonoscopy with a CRC screening program with FIT20 alone in the same cohort. A cohort of 2481 subjects aged > 55 years from the German screening colonoscopy program was included. The colonoscopy findings were used as the gold standard in calculating the diagnostic capacity of the tests and included 15 CRC and 257 advanced neoplasia cases. RAID-CRC Screen added to FIT20 provided the same sensitivity as FIT20 alone (66.7%) in detecting CRC and a significantly higher specificity (97.0% vs. 96.1%, p
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0293678 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id= ... 93678&type=printable (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0293678
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293678
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in PLOS ONE from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosone ().