Gendered dimension of chronic pain patients with low and middle income: A text mining analysis
Ana M Peiró,
Patricia Carracedo,
Laura Agulló and
Sónia F Bernardes
PLOS ONE, 2024, vol. 19, issue 12, 1-12
Abstract:
Methods: This is a mixed-method study using individual interviews (duration between 40–60 minutes) of 181 CNCP patients (71% females) in a tertiary Pain Care Unit, and applying the text mining methodology. Incomes (low or middle) and gender roles (productive vs. reproductive)”. Results: Gender differences were identified in the words used to describe pain impact in working and social life, domestic responsibilities, and family relationships. Albeit having similar CNCP severity and interference, women were on average 8 years older, compared to men, with longer referral time from Primary Care, less retired but more homemakers, showing a greater impact on their mental health. The most discriminating word explaining pain impact for CNCP women was “husband”, for men was “work”, especially among middle income groups. The way men, with a productive gender role, talked about the impact of CNCP in their lives stressed the word “work”. In contrast, men with reproductive roles stressed the words “chores, family or limited” as women with low-income did. Only low-income men used the word “help”. The text mining analysis indicates a discrepant distribution of men and women into traditional gender social roles that are consistent with stereotypical traits and may have an impact on pain care. There is a need of an intersectional perspective as part of pain assessment, to develop novel self-management interventions for men and women.
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0311292 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id= ... 11292&type=printable (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0311292
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311292
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in PLOS ONE from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosone ().