Evaluation of keratometric and total corneal astigmatism measurements from optical biometers and anterior segment tomographers and mapping to reconstructed corneal astigmatism vector components
Achim Langenbucher,
Nóra Szentmáry,
Alan Cayless,
Peter Hoffmann,
Jascha Wendelstein and
Seth Pantanelli
PLOS ONE, 2025, vol. 20, issue 1, 1-16
Abstract:
Purpose: To investigate different measures for corneal astigmatism in the context of reconstructed corneal astigmatism (recCP) as required to correct the pseudophakic eye, and to derive prediction models to map measured corneal astigmatism to recCP. Methods: Retrospective single centre study of 509 eyes of 509 cataract patients with monofocal (MX60P) IOL. Corneal power measured with the IOLMaster 700 keratometry (IOLMK), and Galilei G4 keratometry (GK), total corneal power (TCP2), and Alpin’s integrated front (CorT) and total corneal power (CorTTP). Feedforward shallow neural network (NET) and linear regression (REG) prediction models were derived to map the measured C0 and C45 power vector components to the respective recCP components. Results: Both the NET and REG models showed superior performance compared to a constant model correcting the centroid error. The mean squared prediction errors for the NET/REG models were: 0.21/0.33 dpt for IOLMK, 0.23/0.36 dpt for GK, 0.24/0.35 for TCP2, 0.23/0.39 dpt for CorT and 0.22/0.36 dpt for CorTTP respectively (training data) and 0.27/0.37 dpt for IOLMK, 0.26/0.37 dpt for GK, 0.38/0.42 dpt for TCP2, 0.35/0.36 dpt for CorT, and 0.44/0.45 dpt for CorTTP respectively on the test data. Crossvalidation with model optimisation on the training (and validation) data and performance check on the test data showed a slight overfitting especially with the NET models. Conclusions: Measurement modalities for corneal astigmatism do not yield consistent results. On training data the NET models performed systematically better, but on the test data REG showed similar performance to NET with the advantage of easier implementation.
Date: 2025
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0313574 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id= ... 13574&type=printable (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0313574
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313574
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in PLOS ONE from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosone ().