EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Prevalence and features of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis, United States, 2016–2022

Kaitlin Benedict, Jeremy A W Gold, Mitsuru Toda and Joy Hsu

PLOS ONE, 2025, vol. 20, issue 1, 1-12

Abstract: The epidemiology of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) in the United States is not well-described. To estimate national ABPA prevalence among patients with asthma or cystic fibrosis, characterize ABPA testing practices, and describe ABPA clinical features, treatment, and 6-month outcomes. We used the 2016–2022 Merative™ MarketScan® Commercial/Medicare and Multi-State Medicaid Databases to identify cohorts of patients with 1) asthma, 2) cystic fibrosis (CF), and 3) ABPA. We calculated ABPA prevalence per 10,000 patients with asthma or CF, assessed diagnostic testing for ABPA among patients with severe asthma, and described features of patients with ABPA using diagnosis and procedure codes. The overall ABPA prevalence among patients with asthma was 2.8/10,000 (Commercial/Medicare) and 1.0/10,000 (Medicaid). ABPA prevalence increased with asthma severity (Commercial/Medicare: mild 1.3, moderate 9.3, severe 70.6, Medicaid: mild 0.3, moderate 2.4, severe 32.4). Among patients with CF, ABPA prevalence was 183.7/10,000 (Commercial/Medicare) and 134.6/10,000 (Medicaid). Among patients with severe asthma, 10.3% (Commercial/Medicare) and 7.4% (Medicaid) received total immunoglobulin E testing, which is recommended for ABPA diagnosis. Among all patients with ABPA (Commercial/Medicare: n = 1,564, Medicaid: n = 410), ABPA treatments included inhaled corticosteroids (>70%), systemic corticosteroids (>62%), and antifungals (>18%). Patients with ABPA and Medicaid were more likely to experience hospitalization (45.1% vs. 22.5% of patients with Commercial/Medicare insurance) and respiratory failure (18.5% vs. 10.9%). This analysis provides initial estimates of national ABPA prevalence. Further studies could identify potential barriers to ABPA testing and investigate potential factors affecting payer-related differences in ABPA burden.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0317054 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id= ... 17054&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0317054

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317054

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS ONE from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosone ().

 
Page updated 2025-05-06
Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0317054