Psychological distress and compliance with sanitary measures during the Covid-19 pandemic

Irwin Hecker, Solène Wallez, Honor Scarlett, José Luis Ayuso-Mateos, Richard Bryant, Giulia Caggiu, Claudia Conflitti, Katalin Gémes, Josep Maria Haro, Vincent Lorant, Roberto Mediavilla, Ellenor Mittendorfer-Rutz, Anna Monistrol-Mula, Matteo Monzio Compagnoni, Papoula Petri-Romão, Irene Pinucci, Marit Sijbrandij, Jutta Stoffers-Winterling, Henrik Walter, Murielle Mary-Krause and Maria Melchior

PLOS ONE, 2025, vol. 20, issue 7, 1-14

Abstract: Background: This study aims to understand the relationship between the experience of psychological distress and compliance with COVID-19 sanitary measures. We testeed whether this relationship was modified by individuals’ gender and socioeconomic status (i.e., educational level and employment). Methods: Data from four European cohort studies (n = 13,635), were analysed using an Individual Participant Data (IPD) meta-analytic approach. Mixed effect models were employed to examine associations between mental health difficulties and compliance with sanitary measures, as well as effect modification by socioeconomic status. Statistical models were stratified by gender. Results: We found a statistically significant association between mental health difficulties and increased compliance with sanitary measures in women, while amongst men the statistically significant association observed was opposite. Moreover, there was a statistically significant interaction between participants’ educational level and mental health difficulties amongst men only, indicating especially low compliance levels with COVID-19 sanitary measures amongst individuals with only primary schooling and who reported psychological distress. Conclusion: The association between psychological distress and compliance with sanitary measures is complex–positive in women, negative in men. Men experiencing mental health difficulties, especially those with lower educational attainment, exhibit low levels of compliance with sanitary measures. These results suggest that psychological distress and its possible consequences should be considered when designing measures addressing infectious disease spread.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0317272 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id= ... 17272&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0317272

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317272

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS ONE from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosone ().