Evaluation of ERA5 wind parameter with in-situ data offshore China

Weidong Ji, Rongfu Li, Wenfei Xue, Zhigang Cao, Hongying Yang, Qiaozhen Ning, Xiaokai Hu and Guanghong Liao

PLOS ONE, 2025, vol. 20, issue 5, 1-19

Abstract: There are abundant wind energy resources along the coast of China. Understanding spatial-temporal characteristics of wind speed is significant in meteorology, coastal engineering design and maritime industries. Reliable wind products such as reanalysis data, coupled with accurate wind speed measurements, are essential for elucidating the primary characteristics of the wind field. In this study, we evaluated hourly 10 m and 100 m wind speed data from the fifth-generation ECMWF atmospheric reanalysis (ERA5) by comparing it with direct wind measurements obtained from 19 wind tower located across the coastal waters of China. The results are as follows: 1) the basic statistical characteristic between ERA5 reanalysis and observed wind speeds demonstrate good consistency. However, the ERA5 tends to underestimate wind speed, particularly at high speeds during extreme conditions. 2) Compare ERA5 data with observations from each station using a frequency distribution-based score method, hourly scores of most stations are between 0.8 to 0.9. It shows the higher simulation skill in the northern region than the southern due to the influence of high-frequency typhoon in the South China Sea. 3)Distribution function parameters, mean values, variability, and wind threshold frequencies were analyzed for this ensemble of observation, providing an overall description of wind characteristics. Generally speaking, there is no clear linear relationship between scores and the other variables. On longer time scales (6–24 hours), the score and correlation between ERA5 and observations further increased, while the centered root-mean-square error (CRMSE) and standard deviation decrease. 4) Hourly wind data with a regular spatial distribution in ERA5 reanalysis provides valuable information for further detailed research on meteorology or renewable energy perspectives, but some inherent shortcomings should be considered.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0317751 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id= ... 17751&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0317751

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317751

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS ONE from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosone ().