EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Perceived barriers to physical activity and their predictors among adults in the Central Region in Saudi Arabia: Gender differences and cultural aspects

Osama Abdelhay, Mohammad Altamimi, Qusai Abdelhay, Marwan Manajrah, Ayla M Tourkmani, Mutaz Altamimi and Taghreed Altamimi

PLOS ONE, 2025, vol. 20, issue 2, 1-24

Abstract: Objective: To assess the perceived barriers hindering physical activity among adult residents of Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, and to identify associated sociodemographic and health-related factors, focusing on gender differences and cultural aspects. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted from the 9th of January 2022 to the 2nd of February 2023, involving 7,903 physically inactive participants aged 18 to 80. Participants were recruited using a two-stage cluster sampling method from the Central Region of Saudi Arabia. In the first stage, subregions based on the administrative distribution by the Medical Service Department were selected. In the second stage, private and public entities within these subregions were identified from governmental agency lists. Participants were then conveniently approached within these entities. Data were collected using a validated questionnaire, the Perceived Barriers to Being Active Questionnaire (PBAQ), assessing sociodemographic characteristics, health history, dietary habits, and perceived internal and external barriers to physical activity. Results: Of the participants, 67.2% were male, with a mean age of 36.45 ± 13.69 years. Approximately one-third (35%) reported experiencing at least one internal barrier to physical activity, while 64.3% reported 1–2 internal barriers. For external barriers, 76.5% faced 1–2 barriers. The most common internal barriers were laziness (40.2%) and lack of self-motivation (27.5%); the most prevalent external barriers were lack of facilities (20.2%) and long working hours (19.6%). Females were significantly more likely than males to report cultural reasons (odds ratio [OR] = 4.83; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.06–5.76; p

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0318798 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id= ... 18798&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0318798

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318798

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS ONE from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosone ().

 
Page updated 2025-05-06
Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0318798