Socioeconomic status and older adult’s experiences of weight loss: a qualitative secondary analysis
Anna Newton-Clarke,
Miriam J Johnson,
Ugochinyere Nwulu,
Fliss EM Murtagh and
Alex F Bullock
PLOS ONE, 2025, vol. 20, issue 4, 1-17
Abstract:
Objectives: Unintentional weight loss in older adults is common, with 15–20% of those aged >65 having clinically significant weight loss, associated with increased mortality and morbidity. People with socioeconomic disadvantage are more likely to be overweight but also to become frailer in older age. We explore if socioeconomic status impacts upon patients’ experience of unplanned weight loss. Methods: Qualitative secondary analysis of 23 semi-structured interviews with older adults from two prior studies i), those at risk of frailty ii) those with cancer. Reflexive thematic analysis was conducted, using the lens of the Nutrition Equity Framework, on anonymised transcripts with formation of themes and subthemes, with relationships between themes investigated. Results: Mean age 73 years, range 65–87; 34% male, Index of Multiple Deprivation Quintiles IMD 1 (n=9), IMD 2 (n=4), IMD 3 (n=3), IMD 4 (n=6), IMD 5 (n=1). Three major themes were identified. 1. ‘Healthcare Systems’; interactions with either public health or individual healthcare systems influence patient experiences of weight loss. 2. ‘Personal Factors’; that influence a patient’s view of weight loss and the likelihood of weight loss prompting help-seeking behaviour 3. ‘Can I Change?’; patients’ perspectives of their ability to implement change. Factors in each of the themes were understood through motivating (reinforcing) and demotivating (balancing) factors. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that there is structural and individual inequity in individual views, identification, and clinical management of weight loss. The consequences of this disproportionately affect the most deprived, further confounding the inequalities that already exist.
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0321313 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id= ... 21313&type=printable (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0321313
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321313
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in PLOS ONE from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosone ().