EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Comparative Impact of Integrated Palliative Care vs. Standard Care on the Quality of Life in Cancer Patients: A Global Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Addisu Getie, Afework Edmealem and Tegene Atamenta Kitaw

PLOS ONE, 2025, vol. 20, issue 4, 1-17

Abstract: IntroductionCancer is a leading cause of global morbidity and mortality, significantly impairing patients’ quality of life (QoL). Integrated Palliative Care (IPC) has been proposed as a holistic approach to enhance quality of life by addressing patients’ physical, emotional, and psychosocial needs. While some studies suggest Integrated Palliative Care improves quality of life more than standard care, the evidence remains inconclusive. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the comparative impact of Integrated Palliative Care versus standard care on the quality of life in cancer patients.MethodsA comprehensive search of databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase was conducted. We selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing Integrated Palliative Care and standard care for cancer patients, focusing on the quality of life as measured by validated tools such as the EORTC QLQ-C30 and FACT-G. Data were pooled using a random-effects model to account for study heterogeneity. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were also performed.ResultsNine randomized controlled trials involving 1,794 patients met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis showed that Integrated Palliative Care significantly improved quality of life compared to standard care (SMD = 3.25; 95% CI: 1.20–5.30; p

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0321586 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id= ... 21586&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0321586

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321586

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS ONE from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosone ().

 
Page updated 2025-05-05
Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0321586