Real-world evidence in gynecologic cancers presented at key oncology conferences in the United States: Distribution and factors related to high-tier acceptance
Elizabeth A Szamreta,
Mansi Modi,
Ramu Periyasamy,
Bhavani Yamsani,
Pattabhi Machiraju,
Neetu Menghani and
Matthew Monberg
PLOS ONE, 2025, vol. 20, issue 4, 1-15
Abstract:
Purpose: To describe the distribution, trends, and characteristics of types of real-world evidence (RWE) abstracts presented at key oncology congresses. Methods: Data on gynecologic cancers (cervical, ovarian, endometrial, and multiple gynecologic/other) were extracted from the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) conference databases (2018–2020) to: a) identify the proportion of clinical trial (CT) versus RWE abstracts accepted; b) describe the distribution and tier of acceptance of RWE versus CTs; c) analyze the characteristics (authorship, data source, data type, study design, outcome[s], and presence of statistically significant results) associated with RWE acceptance. Results: Of 3163 abstracts screened, 2271 (77% RWE, 23% CTs) were included. RWE represented a higher proportion of work at SGO versus ASCO (70% vs 30%). Overall, more RWE studies versus CTs were accepted as posters (75% vs 60%), while fewer were accepted as oral presentations (4% vs 20%; p
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0321654 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id= ... 21654&type=printable (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0321654
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321654
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in PLOS ONE from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosone ().