Reputation shortcoming in academic publishing

Rémi Neveu and André Neveu

PLOS ONE, 2025, vol. 20, issue 4, 1-18

Abstract: Editors of scientific journals make central decisions in the publication process. Information peripheral to the content of a manuscript such as the editor’s professional circle and authors’ publishing record may influence these decisions. This constitutes reputation whose role in the publication process remains poorly investigated. Analyzing three decades of publications of 33 Nature journals in physical and life sciences, we show that reputation is tied with publications at the level of editors. The establishment of a non-financial conflict of interest policy and the journals’ impact factor were associated with changes in the number of publications of editors’ former co-authors and authors with a publishing record in Nature journals. We suggest changes at the author and journal levels to mitigate the role of reputation in the publication process.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0322012 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id= ... 22012&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0322012

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322012

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS ONE from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosone ().