Closing the publishing gender gap in economics and political science: Does a critical mass matter?

Daniel Stockemer, Gabriela Galassi and Engi Abou-El-Kheir

PLOS ONE, 2025, vol. 20, issue 5, 1-14

Abstract: Using novel data on publications and citations by researchers in economics and political science in top 50 universities globally, we analyze the relationship between female representation and the gender gap in research output and impact. Using the concepts of substantive representation and critical mass, we expect that the average female researcher in departments with more women publishes more and receives more citations than the average female researcher in universities with a lower share of female faculty. Comparing women’s publication and citation performance for the top 50 universities across the globe relative to men’s, we find support for these expectations. We find that female researchers’ performance matches that of their male counterparts in balanced departments, which are more common in political science. In contrast, the link between female performance and representation is weaker in departments with little gender balance, which are more typical in economics. These findings highlight the importance of reaching a critical mass of female representation to close gender gaps in research output and impact.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0323364 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id= ... 23364&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0323364

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323364

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS ONE from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosone ().