Process evaluation of a pragmatic, multicentre pilot Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) in primary care: Tailored intervention for COPD and Co-morbidities by Pharmacists and Consultant Physicians (TICC PCP)

Karen Wood, Richard Lowrie, Georgia Smith, David Anderson, Jane Moir, Lynda Attwood, Andrew McPherson, Aziz Sheikh, Elaine Rankine and Frances S Mair

PLOS ONE, 2025, vol. 20, issue 6, 1-24

Abstract: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a growing global challenge. We undertook a process evaluation embedded within the Tailored Intervention at home for patients with moderate-to-severe COPD and Co-Morbidities by Pharmacists and Consultant Physicians (TICC PCP) pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT), which explored patient/stakeholder perceptions of the intervention, acceptability of trial procedures, and barriers/facilitators to intervention implementation. Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with intervention patients (20) and stakeholders (10); data were analysed thematically, conceptualised through Normalisation Process Theory. Patient perspectives compared based on socio-economic status (SES). Patients/stakeholders reported positive perceptions of the intervention/trial procedures. Pharmacists provided support across a range of health/social issues. Challenges related to: recruitment; workload/lone-working; managing patient complexity; and data collection. There were suggestions Pharmacists were able to undertake more actions to support patients from low SES areas. Overall, intervention and trial procedures were acceptable to patients and stakeholders. Findings support progression to full-scale RCT.

Date: 2025
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0326178 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id= ... 26178&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0326178

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326178

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS ONE from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosone ().