EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Maximizing cost savings and clinical outcomes: A retrospective analysis of antimicrobial stewardship for meropenem utilization in Saudi Arabia

Rawan T Tafish, Reem Al-Zayer, Faisal Al-Anazi and Jida Al-Mulki

PLOS ONE, 2025, vol. 20, issue 7, 1-14

Abstract: Background: Meropenem, a key antibiotic for multidrug-resistant infections, is often misused, leading to antimicrobial resistance, increased healthcare costs, and excessive consumption. Optimizing its use through antimicrobial stewardship program is crucial to improving clinical outcomes, reducing resistance, and minimizing unnecessary expenditures. Objectives: To evaluate trends in meropenem utilization, compliance, consumption, and cost across consecutive quarters from April 2022 to December 2023, highlighting the impact of the gradual implementation of antimicrobial stewardship guidelines and the pivotal role of clinical pharmacists in improving patient outcomes. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted in a tertiary-care private hospital in Saudi Arabia between April 2022 and December 2023. Meropenem utilization was assessed quarterly based on predefined key indicators to evaluate compliance with antimicrobial stewardship guidelines; Q1-2022 served as a baseline for comparison. Consumption was measured in defined daily doses (DDD) per 1,000 patient-days, and cost analysis was performed using Antimicrobial Cost Per Patient Day (ACPD). The main outcome measures included clinical improvement within 72 hours and transfer or discharge in good clinical condition. Results: Overall compliance with antimicrobial stewardship program guidelines improved significantly from 85.7% in 2022 to 100% in 2023 (p = 0.02). Specific indicators showed substantial progress: compliance with drug interaction considerations increased from 93.8% (123/131) to 98.7% (157/159), appropriate duration compliance rose from 68.3% (82/120) to 90.3% (112/124), and adherence to culture follow-up interventions improved from 51.2% (43/84) to 81.7% (67/82) (all p

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0328673 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id= ... 28673&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0328673

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328673

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS ONE from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosone ().

 
Page updated 2025-07-19
Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0328673