A cross-country analysis of feasible income equality using the sigmoid function and the Boltzmann distribution

Thitithep Sitthiyot and Kanyarat Holasut

PLOS ONE, 2025, vol. 20, issue 8, 1-20

Abstract: This study uses the sigmoid function in combination with the Boltzmann distribution, originally developed by Park and Kim (2021), in order to calculate the optimal income distribution that represents feasible income equality and maximizes total social welfare. Feasible income equality refers to optimal income distribution that is realistically attainable. By employing the data on quintile income shares and the Gini index of 71 countries in 2021 from the World Bank, the results indicate that the optimal income distributions representing feasible income equality, the corresponding values of the Gini index, and the respective shapes of the Lorenz curves of 71 countries are somewhat similar to each other. These results confirm Park and Kim (2021)’s conjecture in that the universal feasible equality line, as depicted by the Lorenz curve, can be identified and applied across multiple countries, potentially serving as a quantitative benchmark. In addition, this study finds that the correlations between the quality of economic and political institutions and the difference between actual and optimal income distributions are negative, suggesting that the better the quality of economic and political institutions is, the closer the gap between actual and optimal income distributions representing feasible income equality. Furthermore, this study estimates the relationship between actual quintile income shares and optimal quintile income shares representing feasible income equality of 71 countries which can be conveniently used to find any approximate level of feasible income share for a particular level of actual income share. Given that high income inequality is associated with health, social, economic, and environmental problems, the overall findings from this study could be useful for designing income redistributive policies and measures.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0329633 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id= ... 29633&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0329633

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329633

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS ONE from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosone ().