Effectiveness of a multilevel intervention to improve mental health of hospital workers: The SEEGEN multicenter cluster randomized controlled trial

Nadine Mulfinger, Marc N Jarczok, Andreas Müller, Melanie Genrich-Hasken, Britta Worringer, Janna Katharina Küllenberg, Florian Junne, Felicitas Rapp, Monika A Rieger, Eva Rothermund-Nassir, Ute Ziegenhain, Nicole R Hander, Imad Maatouk, Madeleine Helaß, Martin Peters, Anja Sander, Regina Krisam, Ronald Limprecht, Elena Gesang, Sascha A Ruhle, Stefan Süß, Bernd Puschner, Peter Angerer and Harald Gündel

PLOS ONE, 2025, vol. 20, issue 8, 1-22

Abstract: Introduction: Hospital workers are at high risk for stress-related mental health issues and are considered a vulnerable workforce in most Western countries. Although multilevel interventions that address individual and organizational factors show promise, there is limited robust evidence of their effectiveness in hospital settings. This study evaluated the SEEGEN trial, a cluster-randomized controlled trial conducted in the German healthcare sector, to assess the effectiveness of a structured multilevel intervention designed to reduce psychosocial stress and to promote mental well-being among hospital employees. The intervention included five modules that targeted different hierarchical levels, sources of interpersonal and structural stress, and potentially vulnerable life stages. These modules were: (i) top management training, (ii) dilemma management – coping by taking responsibility, (iii) promoting stress-preventive relational leadership competence, (iv) reconciling work and family life, and (v) staying healthy at work. Methods: The study was conducted at three clinical centers in Germany and included 18 clusters with a total of N = 415 participants. The clusters were randomly assigned to either an intervention or a wait-list control group. The primary outcome was psychological strain (Irritation Scale; IRR), and the secondary outcomes were mental well-being (WHO-5) and perceived psychosocial safety climate, (PSC-12). Intervention effects were estimated using a two-level linear analysis of covariance. Changes from baseline to the 11-month follow-up were analyzed. Results: The intervention had no statistically significant effect on the primary or secondary outcomes. Conclusions: The lack of significant effects may be attributed to low participation rates, an insufficient intervention dosage, and contextual factors, such as the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and staffing shortages in the participating hospitals. Although the intervention cannot currently be recommended for widespread implementation, the study provides valuable insights into developing, delivering, and overcoming the challenges of multilevel workplace interventions in healthcare settings.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0330490 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id= ... 30490&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0330490

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330490

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS ONE from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosone ().