The influence of perceived threat on the motive attribution asymmetry bias for groups in conflict

Rebecca E Hughes and Brandon D Stewart

PLOS ONE, 2025, vol. 20, issue 9, 1-24

Abstract: Previous research shows higher perceived threat is related to more intergroup bias, usually via greater ingroup positivity. Newer research has identified the Motive Asymmetry Attribution Bias in which ingroup and outgroup members make very different explanations for the motives about why their groups are in conflict. We were interested in this Motive Asymmetry Bias and its relationship to perceived threat with groups in conflict, so we designed two studies to investigate it cross-sectionally (Study 1) and longitudinally (Study 2). We recruited samples of American Republicans and Democrats to complete an online survey measuring perceived threat and Motive Asymmetry Bias. Regression analyses indicated that perceived threat was not related to ratings of one’s own party; however, higher perceived threat was related to more negative ratings of the other party. This discovery is important to help inform different ways to intervene to improve intergroup relations, especially for groups in conflict.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0330927 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id= ... 30927&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0330927

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330927

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS ONE from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosone ().