Assessing the relationship between menstrual products and reproductive and urogenital tract infections (RUTIs): A systematic review evaluating the evidence and recommendations for future research

Ana Krause, Gregory K Zane, Andrea C Rivas-Nieto, Abigail Mulugeta, Md Rezaul Hossain, R Scott McClelland, Jairam R Lingappa and Stephen E Hawes

PLOS ONE, 2025, vol. 20, issue 12, 1-15

Abstract: Background: Concerns regarding the effects of non-tampon menstrual products on reproductive and urogenital health, particularly the risk of infections, is an area of ongoing investigation. We conducted an updated systematic review to assess the methodological quality of current evidence assessing associations between menstrual product use and reproductive and urogenital tract infections (RUTIs), and offer recommendations for future research. Methods: Three databases (PubMed, Web of Science, United States Food and Drug Administration Manufacturer User Facility Device Experience) were searched for relevant published studies or product safety reports up to October 13, 2024. We included studies on menstruators of any age and geography assessing for any reusable/disposable menstrual pads, menstrual cups, or homemade alternatives worn only for menstrual absorbency compared to other menstrual products or no product use, with outcomes centered on RUTIs. Protocols, reviews, and studies assessing only tampons or non-menstrual absorbents were excluded. Results were evaluated and synthesized using tabular methods according to measures of association, and assessed across four criteria categories 1) product definition, 2) comparator definition, 3) outcome definition, and 4) confounder consideration. Results: Thirty-one studies were included in this review. Most studies clearly defined outcomes and considered necessary confounders. In contrast, studies with well-defined products (6.5%) and comparator products (9.7%) were uncommon. Just 3.2% and 9.7% of studies fully defined products and comparators, respectively. Ten studies (32.2%) reported some data on four or more confounders, and seventeen (54.8%) defined their infectious outcomes and included laboratory confirmation. A meta-analysis was not possible due to data heterogeneity across product, comparator, and outcome definitions. Overall, associations between menstrual products and RUTIs are inconclusive. Conclusion: Future studies should 1) clearly define product and comparator type, material, frequency of change, and washing, drying, and storage practices for reusable products, 2) prioritize laboratory or clinician-confirmed outcomes over self-reported symptoms, and 3) adjust for relevant confounders.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0332006 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id= ... 32006&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0332006

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0332006

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS ONE from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosone ().