Predictive value of SOFA, PCT, Lactate, qSOFA and their combinations for mortality in patients with sepsis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Jinmei Lu, Zhouzhou Dong, Longqiang Ye, Yi Gao and Zaixing Zheng

PLOS ONE, 2025, vol. 20, issue 9, 1-19

Abstract: Background: Sepsis is a leading cause of death, necessitating early prediction of mortality risk. Objective: To systematically review the predictive efficacy of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), procalcitonin (PCT), lactate, quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA), and lactate-adjusted qSOFA (LqSOFA) for the risk of death in patients with sepsis. Methods: According to PRISMA-DTA guidelines, PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and CNKI were searched (up to March 2025), and 29 studies were included (n = 41,469). A bivariate random-effects model was used to pool the sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). The ΔAUROC was compared using a random-effects model based on a paired-data design. Heterogeneity was evaluated by I² (>50%) and Cochrane’s Q test. Results: SOFA demonstrated superior predictive efficacy (AUROC = 0.819, 95% CI: 0.783–0.850; sensitivity = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.71–0.82; specificity = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.67–0.79), significantly outperforming PCT (ΔAUROC = 0.10, 95% CI: 0.04–0.16), lactate (ΔAUROC = 0.07, 95% CI: 0.03–0.11), and qSOFA (ΔAUROC = 0.08, 95% CI: 0.05–0.11). LqSOFA (AUROC = 0.823, 95% CI: 0.787–0.854) demonstrated efficacy comparable to SOFA (ΔAUROC = 0.02, 95% CI: −0.02–0.06) and significantly superior to qSOFA (ΔAUROC = 0.06, 95% CI: 0.04–0.08), with a sensitivity of 0.46 (0.24–0.69) and specificity of 0.88 (0.80–0.93). Subgroup analyses revealed sustained high performance in both emergency department (ED) settings (AUROC = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.79–0.85) and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) (AUROC = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.77–0.84). Conclusion: SOFA remains the optimal predictor of sepsis mortality risk. qSOFA demonstrates suboptimal overall predictive ability, whereas LqSOFA achieves comparable accuracy to SOFA by combining the advantages of lactate and qSOFA. Its high specificity may be valuable for rapid risk exclusion in resource-limited settings (ED/LMICs). Future studies should validate LqSOFA across diverse clinical settings and underrepresented LMIC regions and should integrate dynamic lactate clearance metrics.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0332525 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id= ... 32525&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0332525

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0332525

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS ONE from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosone ().