Comparing machine learning, deep learning, and reinforcement learning performance in Culex pipiens predictive modeling
Wei Yin,
Sanad H Ragab,
Michael G Tyshenko,
Teresa Feria Arroyo and
Tamer Oraby
PLOS ONE, 2025, vol. 20, issue 11, 1-16
Abstract:
Several machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) methods have been used to predict the presence of species in classification problems. Another set of methods, called reinforcement learning (RL), has been used in training agents to perform various tasks, but not in predicting species distribution. Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae), commonly known as the common house mosquito, is a globally distributed species prevalent in temperate and subtropical regions. They serve as a primary vector for West Nile Virus (WNV), a mosquito-borne pathogen that affects humans and other animals. The study objective is to compare the performance of logistic regression, random forest classifier, deep neural networks, and the RL methods, including Q-learning, deep Q-network (DQN), REINFORCE, and Actor-Critic, in predicting the historical presence of C. pipiens through their potential geographic distribution in the USA. The comparison showed similar performance across approaches, with reinforcement learning methods like DQN and REINFORCE showing effective performance using fewer features, making them as great prediction tools for changing environments or situations with limited resources. Moreover, the results revealed that altitude and annual precipitation were the most important bioclimatic variables predicting the historical presence of C. pipiens.
Date: 2025
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0333536 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id= ... 33536&type=printable (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0333536
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0333536
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in PLOS ONE from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosone ().