Seizing opportunities: Object neophobia as a factor mediating technical innovation in Goffin´s cockatoos?

Theresa Rössler, Mark O’Hara, Berenika Mioduszewska, Remco Folkertsma, Roger Mundry and Alice M I Auersperg

PLOS ONE, 2025, vol. 20, issue 11, 1-19

Abstract: Most studies find substantial inter-individual differences in problem-solving performance within a species, which can drastically influence an individual´s fitness. It has been suggested that innovative behavior can be strongly affected by behavioral traits, such as exploration, persistence, neophilia, and neophobia. Individuals who are more neophobic than others may encounter fewer opportunities or favorable interactions but may also show differences in cognitive ability. We tested eleven captive Goffin’s cockatoos (Cacatua goffiniana), a model species for innovative problem-solving, for individual variation in object neophobia and whether it relates to motivation and performance in a problem-solving task. We found no evidence that the less neophobic cockatoos were generally better problem-solvers, nor that they were more eager to engage with the setup after familiarization. Our results suggest that object neophobia in this group of Goffin’s cockatoos may not be directly linked to either the ability to innovate or the general motivation to interact with experimental apparatuses. We discuss what these findings could imply for the emergence of innovative behavior as well as the potential limitations of individually tested animals of a highly social species.

Date: 2025
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0335028 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id= ... 35028&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0335028

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0335028

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS ONE from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosone ().