Separate and unequal: Moral domains differ in corresponding social judgments of others

Savannah Adams and Oscar Ybarra

PLOS ONE, 2026, vol. 21, issue 1, 1-18

Abstract: Current research on morality supports the idea that the moral landscape is comprised of several domains. However, the extent to which these domains may be thought of as equivalent when used as the basis for forming impressions or making social judgments is not yet understood. Past literature suggests that there may be notable differences in the evolutionary and social development of different moral behaviors, which raises questions about how actions based in different domains may be interpreted and judged by others. Across three studies, we had participants evaluate social targets based on behaviors pertaining to the moral domains. Results showed that correspondent inferences, attributional bias, and willingness to cooperate differed across domains. Interestingly, the Equality and Property domains emerged distinct. This research contributes to contemporary morality literature and proposes a new direction for understanding how morality plays a role in social judgment.

Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0338026 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id= ... 38026&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0338026

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0338026

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS ONE from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosone ().