If I were you Minority and majority members evaluate relevancy and subjective experience differently while putting themselves in the other’s shoes

Dalit Milshtein, Ahmad Serhan and Simone Shamay-Tsoory

PLOS ONE, 2025, vol. 20, issue 12, 1-22

Abstract: Previous research suggests that asymmetrical power relations between minority and majority groups manifest in various cognitive biases. However, the underlying processes driving these differences remain unclear. Here we examine whether minority and majority groups exhibit differences in their basic ability to imagine outgroup-related scenarios. In two experiments, we asked participants from the majority (Israeli Jews) and minority (Israeli Arabs) groups to put themselves in their respective outgroups’ shoes. The results indicated that majority members perceived outgroup-related themes as less imaginable, relevant, and plausible to themselves compared to the minority group. These findings suggest that an individual’s social power and hierarchical position within society may influence their ability to imagine themselves and others, subsequently contributing to intergroup bias.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0338558 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id= ... 38558&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0338558

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0338558

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS ONE from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosone ().