Reusable multicriteria decision model to evaluate the integrated sustainability impacts of different alternatives of dietary substitutions

Sara M Pires, João Fiéis de Melo, Hernan Gomez Redondo, Ricardo Assunção, Géraldine Boué, Beatrice Biasini, Elena Cozzi, Olivier Jolliet, Davide Menozzi and Ana CL Vieira

PLOS ONE, 2026, vol. 21, issue 2, 1-21

Abstract: Policies promoting shifts towards sustainable diets must consider the health, environmental, and socioeconomic impacts of changes and the trade-offs among these impacts across options. Comprehensive assessments are challenged by data uncertainties, diverse metrics, and conflicting interests of stakeholders. The aim of this study was to build a reusable multicriteria model to evaluate the integrated impacts of food substitutions. We applied a multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) approach that combined input from eight multi-disciplinary experts with evidence collected from scientific literature and public databases across four dimensions: health, environment, economics and social implications of food systems. We tested the approach by assessing the impact of substituting beef with equivalent amounts of pulses in the Portuguese and Danish diets in four scenarios. Results demonstrated an overall positive impact of replacing beef with pulses in both populations, with benefits increasing incrementally with greater levels of substitution. This multicriteria model is adaptable to other contexts and populations, thereby assisting in the development of food policies that consider both health and sustainability concerns.

Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0339454 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id= ... 39454&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0339454

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0339454

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS ONE from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosone ().