Revisiting the excess volatility puzzle through the lens of the Chiarella model

Jutta G Kurth, Adam A Majewski and Jean-Philippe Bouchaud

PLOS ONE, 2026, vol. 21, issue 1, 1-27

Abstract: We amend and extend the Chiarella model of financial markets to deal with arbitrary drift in long-term value in a consistent way. This allows us to improve upon existing calibration schemes, opening the possibility of calibrating individual monthly time series instead of classes of time series. The technique is employed on spot prices of four asset classes from ca. 1800 onward (stock indices, bonds, commodities, currencies). The so-called fundamental value is a direct output of the calibration, which allows us to (a) quantify the amount of excess volatility in these markets, which we find to be large (e.g. a factor ≈4 for stock indices) and consistent with previous estimates; and (b) determine the distribution of mispricings (i.e. the log-difference between market price and value), which we find in many cases to be bimodal. Both findings are strongly at odds with the Efficient Market Hypothesis. We also study in detail the ‘sloppiness’ of the calibration, that is, the directions in parameter space that are weakly constrained by data. The main conclusions of our study are remarkably consistent across different asset classes, and reinforce the hypothesis that the medium-term fate of financial markets is determined by a tug-of-war between trend followers and fundamentalists.

Date: 2026
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0340409 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id= ... 40409&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0340409

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0340409

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS ONE from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosone ().