Symmetry, presumptions, and the judges design

Murat C Mungan

PLOS ONE, 2026, vol. 21, issue 1, 1-20

Abstract: An instrumental variables approach called ‘the judges design’ used frequently in social sciences relies on an assumption called ‘average monotonicity’. This assumption pertains to how different judges’ (or other classifiers’) decision making processes relate to each other. Violations of it are hard to detect, which raises the importance of it being supported by a plausible theory. Decisions of judges who solve Bayesian decision problems violate average monotonicity as long as the signals they process are symmetric and they do not possess strong presumptions. This result is extended to cases where judge presumptions are symmetrically distributed and may include strong presumptions. The analysis reveals factors that can be considered while discussing the plausibility of an assumption made to identify causal effects whose violations are difficult to detect and has important policy implications.“In other cases, however where instrumental variables are used [monotonicity is] not so plausible. Specifically in what are now called judge lenience designs”Guido Imbens,2021 Nobel Prize Lecture

Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0340446 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id= ... 40446&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0340446

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0340446

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS ONE from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosone ().