The effect of a familiarization critical speed testing session on critical speed determination during treadmill running

Lorenzo Micheli, Tommaso Grossi, Silvia Pogliaghi, Francesco Lucertini and Carlo Ferri Marini

PLOS ONE, 2026, vol. 21, issue 2, 1-12

Abstract: Background: The effect of familiarization with the critical speed (CS) testing process on the outcome of CS tests has yet to be determined. Objectives: The main aims of the present study were to determine whether a familiarization session prior to CS testing sessions affects time to task-failure (TTF) on subsequent tests and CS estimations, and whether individual characteristics such as sex and fitness status influence any familiarization effect. Methods: 27 healthy adults (10 females, 25 ± 4 yrs) performed the following treadmill protocol: i) a maximal incremental test to identify peak speed; ii) a familiarization constant-intensity trial (CTfam) at the intensity of the first constant-intensity trial used for CS determination (CTCS), and iii) four randomly ordered maximal constant-intensity trials at ~ 85%, 92%, 98%, and 105% of peak speed. CS was estimated using 2-parameter hyperbolic, linear, and 1/time models including the CTfam (CS not familiarized) or the CTCS (CS familiarized). Familiarized and not-familiarized TTFs and CSs were compared using Wilcoxon tests. Sex effect was analyzed using Mann-Whitney test on the difference in the TTF between CTCS and CTfam. The correlation between peak speed and difference in the TTF between CTCS and CTfam was assessed using Spearman’s rank correlation. α was set at 0.05. Results: CTfam TTF (399 [299] s, median [interquartile range]) was lower (p = 0.009) than CTCS TTF (495[316] s), whereas CS familiarized and not-familiarized were not different in any model (p > 0.05). Sex did not affect the differences between familiarized and not-familiarized TTFs and CS. However, differences in the TTF between CTCS and CTfam were negatively correlated with peak speed (ρ = −0.381, p = 0.050). Conclusions: Familiarization with constant-intensity trials affected the TTF but not CS. Importantly, the familiarization effect was larger in less fit individuals, showing a negative correlation between the TTF differences (i.e., CTCS minus CTfam) and peak speed.

Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0341141 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id= ... 41141&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0341141

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0341141

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS ONE from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosone ().