A novel methodological framework for predicting and mapping agriculture-related soil attributes using Euclidean distance, regular grids, and machine learning algorithms

Gustavo Vieira Veloso, Danilo César de Mello, Elpídio Inácio Fernandes-Filho, Cristiano Marcelo Pereira de Souza, Lucas Augusto Pereira da Silva, Mario Marcos Espirito Santo, Gustavo Mattos Vasques, Maurício Rizzato Coelho and José A M Demattê

PLOS ONE, 2026, vol. 21, issue 5, 1-31

Abstract: Recent advances in statistical and machine learning (ML) methods have improved the prediction of soil attributes at fine spatial scales, yet the comparative performance and reliability of these techniques remain unclear. This study compared Ordinary Kriging (OK), Inverse Distance Weighting (IDW), and ML algorithms in predicting and spatializing soil attributes, while also evaluating prediction uncertainty and computational processing time. Conducted in Minas Gerais State (Brazil), the analysis used Euclidean distance based predictors derived from X-Y coordinates and regular grids with 5, 7, and 10 divisions. Soil attribute maps (CEC, phosphorus, sand, and clay) were generated using OK, IDW, Random Forest (RF), Cubist, Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Earth. Model performance was assessed using R2, RMSE, MAE, and the coefficient of variation. IDW and OK showed the lowest predictive accuracy (R2 = 0.52–0.58), whereas ML methods, especially RF and SVM achieved superior performance (R2 = 0.62–0.70). Among ML algorithms, Earth performed worst, while RF produced the highest accuracy for all attributes except sand, for which SVM performed best. Processing time was shortest for IDW, followed by OK; among ML models, Earth was fastest, followed by RF, SVM, and Cubist. Larger regular grids improved ML prediction and spatialization but increased computational cost. ML methods thus outperform traditional geostatistical interpolators, benefiting from the use of numerous covariates and flexible algorithmic structures, although requiring greater computational time. These findings demonstrate the robustness and practical potential of ML approaches for soil attribute mapping.

Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0343624 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id= ... 43624&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0343624

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0343624

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS ONE from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosone ().