Diagnostic performance of discriminant formulas and machine learning models for detecting β-thalassemia trait in Bangladesh

Rumana Mahtarin, Kasrina Azad, Rakib Bin Mahbub Talukder, Rynak Rahmat, Suzana Chowdhury Nitu, Arif Mahmud Howlader, Mohabbat Hossain, Mst Sharmin Aktar Mukta, Mohammad Tanbir Habib, Abu Bakar Siddik, Nishat Sultana, Zannat Kawser, Umme Kulsum, Faisal Zainal Abedin, Nusrat Sultana, Md Ahashan Habib, A K M Ekramul Hossain, Farjana Akther Noor, Ahmad Zubair Mahdi, Muhammad Asaduzzaman, Emran Kabir Chowdhury, Md Rofiqur Rahman, Firdausi Qadri, Mst Noorjahan Begum and A H M Nurun Nabi

PLOS ONE, 2026, vol. 21, issue 6, 1-28

Abstract: Background: β-thalassemia poses a considerable public health burden in Bangladesh, where a high carrier frequency underlies widespread disease risk. It is necessary to distinguish β-thalassemia trait (βTT) and iron deficiency anemia (IDA) to ensure genetic counseling and enable effective prevention strategies. Despite the availability of various discriminant formulas and machine learning algorithms (MLAs), their comparative diagnostic performance within the Bangladeshi population has not been comprehensively investigated. This study aimed to assess different discriminant formulas and ML models as well as to propose novel combinations of formulas for population-specific screening of βTT. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we compared 47 discriminant formulas and 12 machine learning models to distinguish β-thalassemia trait from iron-deficiency anemia in 467 individuals (143 βTT, 324 anemia) drawn from a 2,514-participant cohort. DF-6 and DF-27 were two new formulas constructed by integrating high-performing formulas. Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) techniques, TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) and SECA (Simultaneous Evaluation of Criteria and Alternatives), provided the final ranking for performance. Cluster analysis was performed to identify groups with similar diagnostic performance. Results: Population-specific optimal cut-off values were determined for the discriminant formulas. The newly proposed formulas, DF-6 and DF-27, ranked among the top ten performers alongside RBC, Janel (11T), Ravanbakhsh-F1, Srivastav, Alparslan, Hisham, Index 26, and Kerman I. DF-6 (AUC: 0.9707) achieved the best overall performance across the diagnostic metrics. DF-6 achieved the best overall performance (AUC: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.97–0.99, p

Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0350387 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id= ... 50387&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0350387

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0350387

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS ONE from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosone ().