Stage-driven mortality and clinical risk stratification among lung cancer patients in Dhaka, Bangladesh: A multi-hospital secondary analysis

Sourov Das, Sushmita Kundu and Salma Jahan Tanny

PLOS ONE, 2026, vol. 21, issue 10, 1-13

Abstract: Introduction: Lung cancer is a major cause of cancer mortality, and patient-level outcome data from Bangladesh remain limited. Locally relevant, interpretable risk-stratification models may help identify patients with higher recorded mortality risk using routinely available clinical variables. This study evaluated mortality-associated factors and the hospital-wise internal-external validation performance of a clinical risk-stratification model among lung cancer patients in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Methods: We performed a retrospective secondary analysis of a publicly available, de-identified multi-hospital dataset comprising 1,782 patients. The primary endpoint was recorded binary mortality status, defined from the source variable survived (No = mortality event; Yes = no recorded mortality event). Multivariable logistic regression was used for association analysis. A hospital-agnostic logistic prediction model was evaluated using leave-one-hospital-out internal-external validation. Discrimination was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), calibration by Brier score, calibration intercept and slope, and predicted-risk deciles, and potential clinical utility by decision curve analysis. Results: Among 1,782 patients, 770 (43.2%) were recorded as survived = No. Recorded mortality increased across cancer stages: 16.3% in Stage I, 32.5% in Stage II, 55.6% in Stage III, and 79.2% in Stage IV. Compared with Stage I, adjusted odds ratios were 2.54 (95% CI 1.86 to 3.46) for Stage II, 6.66 (95% CI 4.86 to 9.14) for Stage III, and 20.77 (95% CI 14.46 to 29.83) for Stage IV. Surgery was associated with lower adjusted odds than chemotherapy (adjusted OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.89). Apparent AUROC was 0.769; pooled leave-one-hospital-out AUROC was 0.753 with a Brier score of 0.198. Pooled calibration yielded an intercept of −0.031 and slope of 0.911. At the evaluated 0.05 increments, the model had greater net benefit than treat-all and treat-none strategies from approximately 0.20 to 0.75. Conclusion: Recorded mortality in this multi-hospital Bangladeshi lung cancer dataset was strongly stage-driven. An interpretable logistic risk model showed moderate discrimination and reasonable calibration across hospital-wise internal-external validation. These findings support further evaluation of routinely available clinical risk stratification, but independent external and prospective validation are required before clinical implementation.

Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0359406 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id= ... 59406&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0359406

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0359406

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS ONE from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosone ().