EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Predicting unplanned readmissions in neurological patients: A large-scale AI-driven analysis using CHAID decision trees

Randa Al-Kharabsheh and Muayyad Ahmad

PLOS ONE, 2026, vol. 21, issue 10, 1-11

Abstract: Background: Unplanned readmissions in neurology signify care gaps, increasing costs, and morbidity. This study aimed to develop and internally validate an AI model to predict unplanned readmissions among neurological patients in Jordan. Method and materials: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 2,795 adult neurology admissions (2022–2024). Patients’ diagnosis was grouped and analyzed based on the International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision. Nine prediction models were compared using Electronic Health Record (EHR) data. The Chi-square Automatic Interaction Detection (CHAID) decision tree was selected for optimal performance and interpretability. Results: The unplanned readmission rate was 8.9%, highest in the neoplasm group (24%). The CHAID model demonstrated modest discriminative ability (AUC = 0.671). For risk stratification, it achieved a balanced accuracy of 0.63, sensitivity of 0.52, and specificity of 0.74. Key predictors were Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI ≥ 5), age, geographic region, length of stay, and sex. Risk-stratification metrics were calculated descriptively from the complete cohort, whereas independent model validation was based on the held-out test-set AUC. Subgroup analysis revealed distinct risk profiles: vascular patients with high CCI (p

Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0360077 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id= ... 60077&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0360077

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0360077

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS ONE from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosone ().

 
Page updated 2026-10-11
Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0360077