Longitudinal changes in hand hygiene adherence among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic, Dominican Republic
C Daniel Schnorr,
Kathryn W Roberts,
Eulogia C Payano,
Paloma Martínez Guzmán,
Michael de St. Aubin,
Matthew Lozier,
Salome Garnier,
Devan Dumas,
Kelsey McDavid,
Cecilia Jocelyn Then Paulino,
Ronald Skewes-Ramm,
Christina Craig,
Emily Zielinski Gutierrez,
William Duke and
Eric Nilles
PLOS Water, 2024, vol. 3, issue 5, 1-15
Abstract:
Hand hygiene (HH) can reduce transmission of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) in healthcare facilities and is especially important in low- and middle-income countries where HH infrastructure may be insufficient and the burden of HAIs is highest. At baseline, we assessed HH infrastructure and practices among healthcare workers (HCWs) at two large hospitals in the Dominican Republic during the COVID-19 pandemic. HCWs were observed for HH adherence (HHA) (defined as the use of alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) or handwashing with soap and water) before and after patient contact and donning new gloves before patient contact. The baseline assessment was repeated following implementation of local production and distribution of ABHR and a HH promotion campaign. Descriptive analyses and regression models evaluated predictors of HHA and glove use. Cumulative HHA was 18.9%. While patient-care areas with a functional HH resource increased from 47% at baseline to 92% after the intervention, HHA declined from 23.0% to 16.7%. HHA was higher after patient contact (aOR = 5.88; 95% CI = 4.17–8.33), during a period of increased COVID-19 risk (aOR = 1.69; 95% CI = 1.05–2.77), during invasive patient contacts (aOR = 1.64; 95% CI = 1.23–2.17) and when gloves were not used (aOR = 1.25; 95% CI = 1.01–1.56). The negative association between glove use and HHA diminished when access to HH resources increased. New gloves were donned before 39.6% of patient contacts. Glove use was higher among nurses (aOR = 7.12; 95% CI = 3.02–16.79) and during invasive contacts (aOR = 4.76; 95% CI = 2.27–10.0). While access to HH resources increased after the interventions, HHA did not increase. HHA was lower when COVID-19 risk was lower. Findings from this study may guide future efforts to increase HHA among HCWs.
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/water/article?id=10.1371/journal.pwat.0000231 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/water/article/file?id=10 ... 00231&type=printable (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pwat00:0000231
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pwat.0000231
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in PLOS Water from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by water ().